From ff687263cee01615de2d088ed5b17a3f0be5f4d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "j.goderbauer" <j.goderbauer@adito.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:01:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] GDPR: Workaround for loading by idvalues (e.g. on "Save and
Open")
---
.../recordcontainers/jdito/contentProcess.js | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/entity/DSGVO_entity/recordcontainers/jdito/contentProcess.js b/entity/DSGVO_entity/recordcontainers/jdito/contentProcess.js
index be1eae350e9..488dd2cdd88 100644
--- a/entity/DSGVO_entity/recordcontainers/jdito/contentProcess.js
+++ b/entity/DSGVO_entity/recordcontainers/jdito/contentProcess.js
@@ -16,6 +16,20 @@ var filterCond;
if (vars.exists("$local.idvalues") && vars.get("$local.idvalues") && vars.get("$local.idvalues").length > 0)
{
filterCond = newWhere("DSGVO.DSGVOID", vars.get("$local.idvalues"), SqlBuilder.IN());
+ //this is a workaround: when using $local.idvalues the contactId-param may not be set.
+ //But the DataPrivacyUtils.collectAll function needs a contactId to work properly, and there exists no other function to load the data by uids
+ //when the upper TODO is done, this workaround can be removed
+ if (contactId == null)
+ {
+ var contactIds = (new SqlBuilder()).selectDistinct("DSGVO.CONTACT_ID")
+ .from("DSGVO")
+ .where(filterCond)
+ .arrayColumn();
+ if (contactIds.length > 1)
+ throw new Error("DSGVO_entity.jdito.contentProcess: tried to load data for more than one contact; this is not implemented");
+
+ contactId = contactIds[0];
+ }
}
var data = DataPrivacyUtils.collectAll(contactId, filterCond)
--
GitLab